I’ve received many questions about the January 17, 2013 proceeding with the State Board of Education (SBOE). As you know, the outcome was to postpone and then reconvene the hearing on February 21, 2013. Most of the questions I’ve received assumed the proceeding on the 17th was a hearing. I am of the opinion the proceeding did not meet the definition of a hearing in both construction and adherence to procedural requirements. Why do I hold this opinion?
- The SBOE must conduct a hearing pursuant to O.C.G.A. § 20-2-73.
- The hearing must be conducted subject to SBOE Rule 160-5-1-.36.
- The “Notice and Order” sent by the SBOE required both parties (SBOE and DBOE) to file witness and document lists by 1/11/13. It is my understanding that it was acknowledged that neither party had adequate time to prepare complete lists as necessary to conduct a formal hearing. Furthermore, former board members who had received the Notice were instructed that their presence would not be required on the 17th.
- If a formal hearing was anticipated, given that the 3 former board members would have pertinent testimony, they would not have been released from attending the proceeding.
- Furthermore, there are many documents to admit into evidence and witnesses to testify to various matters discussed in the AdvancED/SACS Special Review Report on behalf of both parties. Neither party had produced a comprehensive list of witnesses or documents. Certainly, staff members from DCSD and AdvancED would need to be present, along with documents, to discuss the issues in the report. Staff members and documents were conspicuously absent.
- The statute provides that the hearing must be held no later than 30 days after receipt of the report from AdvancED. Given the prerequisites for a hearing were not met, why wasn’t the proceeding officially begun and immediately set to reconvene at the next available date? Knowing in advance that the requirements to hold the hearing were not met, why was the public not informed that the hearing would be adjourned to reconvene in February?
I know many of you took time away from family responsibilities and work to attend the proceeding. Many of you obtained childcare so you could be present. As no action could be taken on the 17th given the procedural constraints, I wish the SBOE had notified you in advance that the proceeding could only culminate in a hearing at a later date.
It was interesting to note several SBOE members testified that the DeKalb BOE should be more “aggressive” in getting information from the DCSD administration about various issues, including financial data. This seems at odds with statements in the AdvancED/SACS report. I’m in agreement with the SBOE. Board members must have a full and unobstructed view of the facts. Well paid administrators shouldn’t be prickly or sensitive about questions from the board. If board members had been more aggressive over the past decade, we wouldn’t have found ourselves in this mess. Sometimes the “governance team” paradigm that is held up as a model of unity makes me wonder what “team” everyone is playing for. What if the “governance team” sells mediocrity as success and avoidable financial disasters as simple errors? Today’s citizens are savvy enough to see through that type of spin and rightly demand much more. Food for thought.
School Choice Week – Empowering Parents in DeKalb
This week is National School Choice Week. School Choice is about parent empowerment. If we return the power to parents to govern schools alongside principals and teachers, the cause of education will be well-served. It also turns schools into innovation laboratories. It dislodges the bureaucratic hold on budgets and policy. It allows teachers to teach unencumbered by one-size-fits-all programs, paperwork and creativity-killing dictates. It allows principals to develop policies that are right for their school. It minimizes the footprint and potential entanglements of district-wide financial problems. I’m an advocate for implementing this type of real local control in DeKalb. It would be a reforming and sustainable model for successful outcomes for kids. This model is called the Portfolio Strategy. It empowers parents and gives them choices.
If you support empowering parents, communities and teachers, please join me at the School Choice Rally at the Capitol on Thursday at 10am. For more details, go to this website: http://www.schoolchoicerally.com/ . You can also show your support for reforming our district by reading my Declaration of Parent Empowerment and sharing it with other parents and leaders.